Allison Hanes: At some point, Ottawa must stand up for the Constitution (2023)

Predictably, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau's comments about the notwithstanding clause drew a stern rebuke from Premier François Legault.

Author of the article:

Allison Hanes Montreal Gazette

Published Jan 23, 20234 minute read

17 Comments

Allison Hanes: At some point, Ottawa must stand up for the Constitution (1)

Article content

Let’s face it: Prime Minister Justin Trudeau is damned if he does and damned if he doesn’t.

Story continues below

This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

Article content

We apologize, but this video has failed to load.

Try refreshing your browser, or
tap here to see other videos from our team.

Allison Hanes: At some point, Ottawa must stand up for the Constitution Back to video

We apologize, but this video has failed to load.

Try refreshing your browser, or
tap here to see other videos from our team.

If he dares even muse about standing up for constitutional rights and reining in the overuse of the notwithstanding clause by the provinces, he knows he will earn a stern rebuke from Quebec Premier François Legault. If he doesn’t, he comes across as a doormat too weak to stand up for the most basic principles of justice in a democratic society.

Allison Hanes: At some point, Ottawa must stand up for the Constitution (2)

Sign up to receive daily headline news from the Montreal Gazette, a division of Postmedia Network Inc.

By clicking on the sign up button you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. You may unsubscribe any time by clicking on the unsubscribe link at the bottom of our emails or any newsletter. Postmedia Network Inc. | 365 Bloor Street East, Toronto, Ontario, M4W 3L4 | 416-383-2300

Article content

This no-win situation explains why Trudeau typically only addresses this sensitive and unsettled question when called upon to do so — like when asked about it by journalists. It also explains why, despite lofty pronouncements, his government is still reluctant to do anything concrete to prevent provinces from making an end run around the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms nearly four years after Quebec and Ontario pioneered this crafty strategy.

Story continues below

This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

Article content

So we’ve seen this past weekend when La Presse published a one-on-one interview with Trudeau in which he was asked about the pre-emptive use of the notwithstanding clause.

“We’re in a period of normalizing the suspension of fundamental rights,” the prime minister lamented. “That worries me.”

When asked about it again in Toronto on Monday, Trudeau reiterated his opposition to proactively thwarting legal challenges.

Cue a tirade from Legault, whose reaction was as swift as it was predictable. The premier took to social media Saturday to denounce this “frontal attack” on Quebecers and again on Monday.

“Quebec will never accept such a weakening of its rights. Never!” Legault fumed.

We’ve seen this film before, most notably during the last federal election campaign when Trudeau twisted himself into a pretzel in defending constitutional rights while simultaneously trying to avoid a clash with Legault. The end result of this tap dance was Legault endorsing the hands-off Conservatives as the best choice to lead Canada.

Story continues below

This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

Article content

Not that voters listened, of course, returning another Liberal minority to office. But many moons later, Justice Minister David Lametti is still studying Ottawa’s options, which essentially boil down to seeking a reference from the Supreme Court of Canada or intervening if and when a challenge of the law ends up before the high court.

But the longer Quebec and Ontario are allowed to skirt constitutional rights with impunity, the worse the blowback is going to be.

Ontario Premier Doug Ford was the first to shield a questionable law from court challenges back in 2018 when he decided to slash the size of Toronto city council in half, during a municipal election campaign no less.

Legault has resorted to it to safeguard Bill 21, Quebec’s secularism law, which was adopted in 2019. He relied on it again with Bill 96, legislation to strengthen French, passed last year.

Story continues below

This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

Article content

If Legault has been highly strategic, using the clause to protect laws that touch identity and values, Ford has used it for petty purposes. He ham-fistedly attempted to impose a new collective agreement on education workers, but was forced to back down when it resulted in a general strike in schools.

It would certainly be easier for the federal government to justify intervening to stop the bungling Ford. But Legault takes advantage of the fact the secularism and language laws are popular. He also benefits from lingering bitterness that Quebec has never been brought into the Constitution.

Still, insisting on the protection of Charter rights is not a frontal attack. It’s in the interests of Quebecers, as much as any other Canadians.

Story continues below

This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

Article content

This is not to say there are never grounds to use the notwithstanding clause, but it should be the exception not the norm. And it should only happen as a last resort, after court challenges run their course, like when then-premier Robert Bourassa turned to it to uphold Quebec’s sign law.

Quebec Superior Court has found Bill 21, which forbids public servants in positions of authority from wearing religious garb, violates minority rights, especially those of Muslim women. But the judge said he was powerless to strike down the law because of the pre-emptive use of the notwithstanding clause.

Lametti has previously indicated Ottawa will join the challenge — someday, if and when it reaches the Supreme Court.

The latest war of words is no indication the federal government is any closer to getting involved. More likely it’s a sign the old stalemate will continue — especially if (God forbid) there is another federal election on the horizon.

But at a certain point push must come to shove. Otherwise the Constitution will no longer be worth the paper it’s written on.

ahanes@postmedia.com

  1. Hanes: If you dare to disagree with Legault, you are 'attacking Quebec'
  2. Hanes: Even kids can see Bill 21 is wrong, why can't our leaders?

Trending

  1. Montreal is in the path of a major snowstorm expected Wednesday
  2. Singer proud to wear kippah while belting out national anthems at Bell Centre
  3. Fire engulfs medical equipment factory near Highway 13
  4. Montreal métro Blue Line to get a new brain
  5. Jack Todd: Cole Caufield's injury is a sign of a system that needs mending

Related Stories

  1. Pre-emptively using notwithstanding clause 'not the right thing to do:' Trudeau Trudeau said his government plans to intervene when Bill 21 reaches the Supreme Court.

    13hours, 49minutes ago News

  2. Legault accuses Trudeau of a 'frontal attack' on Quebec's rights Trudeau has said he would like to submit the question of the notwithstanding clause of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms to the Supreme Court of Canada to outline rules necessary to employ it.

    2days, 15hours ago Quebec

  3. Story continues below

    This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

  4. Trudeau and Poilievre cross paths in Quebec The prime minister is in the Mauricie region as part of a tour to promote his government's energy transition plan.

    5days, 13hours ago Quebec

  5. Quebec has been 'extraordinarily generous' regarding Roxham Rd., Trudeau says "We recognize Quebec's leadership in this, but we want to be in a situation where it is not necessary," Trudeau said of the province welcoming asylum seekers who enter Canada at the irregular crossing.

    6days, 8hours ago Local News

  6. Taxpayers group slams salary hikes for top civil servants in Quebec Premier François Legault is being called upon to explain to taxpayers why they are having to subsidize pay increases of up to 20 per cent.

    13hours, 20minutes ago Quebec

Latest National Stories

Story continues below

This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

This Week in Flyers

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Neely Ledner

Last Updated: 02/07/2023

Views: 6099

Rating: 4.1 / 5 (62 voted)

Reviews: 93% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Neely Ledner

Birthday: 1998-06-09

Address: 443 Barrows Terrace, New Jodyberg, CO 57462-5329

Phone: +2433516856029

Job: Central Legal Facilitator

Hobby: Backpacking, Jogging, Magic, Driving, Macrame, Embroidery, Foraging

Introduction: My name is Neely Ledner, I am a bright, determined, beautiful, adventurous, adventurous, spotless, calm person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.